Khovid and Khover-ups
With regard to the infamous khovid pandemic, any critique of the “official narrative” will, still, draw heated responses from members of the body public, usually along the lines of one or more of the following:
- You’re a conspiracy theorist
- You’re an anti-vaxer
- I’ve suffered from the virus myself
- I have friends/family who have suffered and died from the virus
- I know people who work in the health service who have suffered and died
1. You’re a conspiracy theorist:
This is simple and lazy shorthand for keyboard warriors disinclined to think beyond what the corporate media delivers to them on a plate. It has no real meaning any more as the “brand” has the primary purpose of making it easy for developed arguments to be ridiculed and dismissed by the simplest and laziest. Conspiracies exist, and there may be many theories about them. Theories are usually just that – suppositions based on available information and posited for examination and critique. (I say “available” because so much information is actively kept from us.) But lump the terms together and you have the “brand”, the weaponised shorthand, for getting people to shut up.
2. You’re an “anti-vaxer”
The good old “anti-vax” epithet still gets bandied about in discussions of this sort.
When I was a boy I received, among others, an anti-polio vaccine. I was and am grateful for this. I saw too many of my generation horribly afflicted by the disease. I and my children have had and appreciated many vaccines since. Many of us supported those older, properly peer-reviewed vaccines which included a miniscule hit of the disease itself to allow immune systems to build up their own anti-bodies.
But a breakdown of trust and the Turning Point occurred – as outlined below under Three Points – at the escape of a publicly funded, genetically modified virus followed by lies and a reliance, at enormous public expense, on the genetic modifiers themselves to crank out a solution.
These later “vaccines” – actually called Gene Therapy Products (GTP) or Genetic Vaccines – involve genetic modification (GM). Like, I suspect, many of you, I am not a knowing or willing ingestor of GM foods. I think GM (like Ai) in general has a host of variables for which its corporate proponents have little concern beyond short term profit. So why would I (or you) not have reservations about a poorly reviewed and producer-indemnified “vaccine” that involves synthetically generated genetic code being injected directly into one’s body?
So “anti-vax” is not just inaccurate. It is also just another lazy and useless term, encouraging “branding” and shorthand weaponisation to shut people up..
3. 4. & 5. Suffering and Death
The heated responses are particularly fevered because there are many sufferers and friends and family of sufferers out there who feel outrage as their suffering and grief appears to be being denied.
Let me be clear here now.
No one, certainly not I, is denying that many many people have suffered and died – both with and without the injections. That, after all, was the specific purpose of the virus (see the Three Points below). No one can possibly counter personal feelings of loss and suffering and I have no wish to. I have friends and family of my own who have suffered.
Nor can one disparage the courageous medical staff who, often left in the dark and confused themselves, lost and suffered in dealing with the virus on the very front line.
But the loss and suffering does not negate the concerns arising out of the sourcing, the release, the cover-up of and the response to the outbreak.
What I, and others, are querying is:
- the Reasons for all that loss and suffering
- the Solutions offered
- the Diagnoses used to justify those solutions, and
- the facts and Data being generated and reported to support those Solutions
I, and others, are not denying that the virus was/is potentially deadly.
But what we are very much doubting is the underlying narrative and reporting.
Three Points – back to the very basics
At least three points are now fairly well established and now echoed even in the sadly off pace and selectively myopic mainstream / corporate media. These are:
a) The source of the problematic virus was the Wuhan lab in China which was conducting research into “gain of function” – ie. could such a virus be modified to jump from one species to another (in this case, to humans – why in the name of all that’s holy would anyone of sound mind be funding such research anyway?)
b) This research, green-lit by Dr Anthony Fauci, was entirely American funded (what other dubious Western funded research is taking place in Wuhan and elsewhere?)
c) As the breakout got underway, Fauci and others launched a major cover-up.
So, taking these as a starting vantage, what is the first extractable factoid arising out of just the above points alone?
Well, irrefutably, the “official narrative” was lying to us from the very outset.
We all know that corporations lie. Corporations*, like psychopaths, tell you what you want to hear, and then do what they want to do anyway. But public health institutions? At a time of global crisis, we were being lied to by publicly funded institutions put in place, at our expense, to inform and protect us.
I don’t know about you, but, personally, I find it very difficult ever again to believe someone whom I’ve caught out in an outright lie. Trust is built up over extensive periods of good faith, but can be destroyed by a single proven lie.
I’m guessing that few of us would disagree that the virus, once leaked, was/is a profound danger to humans. That, after all and as mentioned above, was its specific purpose. There can be no denying that humans suffered and died on a significant scale from the outbreak of this virus.
And clearly, once out of the bottle, remedies had to be found. So the public institutions who had lied to us turned to the corporations who lie as a form of good business practice to help get the genie back into the bottle.
Does that sound like a recipe for success?
Distorted Reporting
As the outbreak and the cover-up got underway, many of us sensed contradictions in the general reporting. In the early stages it was all about unhygienic Chinese taking sloppy lab work out to messy marketplaces, aided and abetted by drummed up Fear & Hatred towards China. And the virus the messy Chinese were playing about with was “natural” – unmeddled with. No mention, in those early stages, of “gain of function”, let alone American funding.
My own suspicions were heightened when I watched Fauci prevaricate in front of US Senate committee hearings – at which, it was eventually established, he perjured himself (for which presumably, in part, Biden was pressed to provide a presidential pardon).
In an effort to cover his tracks, Fauci pressured, as proven by leaked email correspondence, respectable researchers to say that there was no synthetic manufactured genetic code in the Wuhan virus – despite the fact that they had already reported that, yes indeed, incontestably, there was such code present. This established that the virus wasn’t naturally occurring among messy Chinese market stalls, but premeditatedly and purposefully created in a high tech lab. In fear of losing significant funding and being black-listed (see Black Listing below), the researchers recanted.
So, having watched all this unfold, I, and others, began to suspect, yet again, the “official narrative”. Fauci and his corporate Best Friends Forever began to crank out – at enormous public expense – poorly trialed solutions on a massive scale even as these untruths were coming out. So some of us were, unsurprisingly, sceptical.
And what were the good old mainstream corporate media doing? They were busy generating their usual Fear & Hatred shite against not just those unhygienic and messy Chinese, but also against anybody who questioned the good old official narrative.
Black Listing
For example, as long ago as 1976, during the now discredited “swine flu epidemic”, Dr John Anthony Morris, a highly respected virologist and bacteriologist and then chief US vaccine officer had the temerity to say publicly that the vaccines being pushed at that time were not only useless but also dangerous in terms of side effects.
His research materials were immediately seized, the locks to his offices changed, his staff reassigned elsewhere, and he was shoved into a windowless office with no telephone. His career was effectively destroyed until he was fully exonerated in the law courts 10 years later.
In 1979 he told the Washington Post that the entire swine flu response was “a medical rip-off” arising out of collusion between high ranking public health officials such as Fauci and big pharma corporations.
Diagnosis Pressure
As the corporate media were getting hysterical about messy Chinese and “anti-vaxers” and “conspiracy theorists”, Fauci and co were pumping out Data on accelerating rates of spread and the urgency for everybody to get the Genetic Vaccine as soon as possible. Logically, many of us had doubts about the Data because we’d already been lied to from the very outset.
As mentioned above, Fauci and co also had a history in the business of discrediting and blackmailing any medical practitioners who object to the roll out of his vaccines.
But the icing on this particular cake was the discovery of the little known extent to which hospitals and medical practitioners were/are being pressured into diagnosing khovid against their better judgement in order to protect their corporate/government administered grant income.
In essence, many of the managers of the frontline medical responders were being pressured into not just misdiagnosing, but also into misprescribing solutions. Significant support funding (all from the public – our – purse) was on offer to institutions prescribing specific remedies produced by big pharma corporations.
I had several links to personal stories illustrating this phenomenon, but they, like so many others, have been taken down (hence my use of the term “khovid). As and when I come across more, they will be appended on an ongoing basis at the end of this piece.
Messing with the Data
One of the more engaging videos I came across was Dr Annette Bosworth’s who was reporting on the “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned” paper summarised below.
As she stresses, she was not a vax-skeptic or “theorist” at all, but the paper was drawn to her attention and she was taken seriously aback, throwing into question her own professional role in administering the Genetic Vaccine.
You may need to be patient. It is clearly not a well-rehearsed presentation. It is hesitant in many places, with plenty of “ums”, but her humanity and professional concern are evident and I recommend a watch.
If it’s still there, see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3N-uFfvU5s&list=PLHL_OwNcAqRIYGvtkBrTr2Mi2dgb8myCN&index=25
If, like so many others, the clip has disappeared, see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHs8WpLBq9Y
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign
M Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff, Russ Wolfinger, Jessica Rose, Kris Denhaerynck, Steve Kirsch, Peter A McCullough
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):r137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.r137. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Abstract
“Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms.
In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged.
Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders.
Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data.
The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits.
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”
Keywords:
autoimmune; cardiovascular; covid-19 mrna vaccines; gene therapy products; immunity; mortality; registrational trials; risk-benefit assessment; sars-cov-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2); serious adverse events.
Copyright © 2024, Mead et al.
(Note: Peter McCullough also wrote the first widely circulated “protocol” for dealing with the outbreak.)
Broader Implications
The concerns listed above aren’t limited to the pandemic outbreaks, or even global health, alone.
As corporations leach into our democratic systems we see the pattern** repeated more and more. We see vastly profiting corporations and their major shareholders buying and selling politicians, legislation, and even legal systems (eg. look up ICISD which allows corporations to sue governments who might have environmental or human rights concerns).
We’ve already been told more pandemics are on the way. Should we be placing our doe-eyed trust in lying corporations and compromised public institutions and simply be ready to comply with whatever their fevered minds come up with next?
Or should we be preparing for such promised pandemics in a more open, critical, transparent, properly reviewed, noncorporate-influenced way?
* read The Corporation, – Joel Bakan, and/or see the documentary trailer at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exY4u0XsEGI
** for an attempt at illustrating the wider pattern recognition see:
https://deaconmartin.com/writing/unified-theory
Appendix 1.
A major source for many of my khovid points of view derive from (among others) “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F Kennedy Jr.
Many of you will have bought into the “Kennedy is a completely mad anti-vaxer” narrative, and have additionally been put off by his agreeing to work in President Pumpkin’s administration, but I would urge you to suspend these concerns for a moment and have a look at the book.
You don’t even have to buy it! It is freely downloadable as text or pdf from:
https://archive.org/details/kennedy-robert-f.-the-real-anthony-fauc-pdf
I bought the book before I was able to discover the pdf. It is a very dense read and I am still wading through it, but I have found it highly compelling and credible. One of my problems is that, although it is copiously footnoted and referenced, there is neither an Index nor a Glossary for the many acronyms being bandied about. I’m a heavy Index user and was a bit bogged down by this absence until I found the link above and was able to word and acronym search electronically.
Appendix 2.
Tales from the AIDS story – detailed in the above mentioned book.
“Due to compelling financial drivers, in Africa, AIDS is nearly always a presumptive diagnosis, applied without any ‘positive’ reaction to HIV tests,” said science journalist Celia Farber. “Big Pharma, researchers, clinics, international health agencies beginning with WHO, and local governments conspire to keep this stunningly road and generic clinical definition of AIDS in Africa,” she explains. “From the beginning it was a signal for funding. They are all in on the joke, because they are all helping themselves by skimming the unprecedented international funding streams that flow to African AIDS relief.”
“AIDS is huge business, possibly the biggest in Africa,” says James Shikwati in a 2005 interview with Der Spiegel. Shikwati is founder of the Inter Region Economic Network, a society for economic promotion in Nairobi (Kenya). “Nothing else gets people to fork out money like shocking AIDS figures. AIDS is a political disease here: we should be very Skeptical.”
“If Fauci’s HIV/AIDS hypotheses were true, they should have been able to develop a vaccine,” observes Dr. David Rasnick, a PhD biochemist who has worked for thirty years in the pharmaceutical biotech field. “Fauci’s fundamental conundrum is that he has told everybody to diagnose AIDS based on the presence of HIV antibodies. With every other disease, the presence of antibodies is the signal that the patient has vanquished the disease. With AIDS, Fauci and Gallo, and now Gates, claim it’s a sign you’re about to die. Think about it; if the objective of an AIDS vaccine is to stimulate antibody production, then success would mean that every vaccinated person would also have an AIDS diagnosis. I mean, this is fodder for a comedy bit. It’s like someone gave the Three Stooges an annual billion-dollar budget!”
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking and you know he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there, you’ll know it… He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. And he should not be in the position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. Those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we’d like them to have, being that we pay them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to, and they smugly, like Tony Fauci, do not mind going on television, in front of the people that pay his salary, and lie directly into the camera.” – Dr. Kary Mullis, winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique, from interview with Gary Null, 1993.
Appendix 3.
Long Covid patient in Cambridge tells how simple treatment took her from being almost paralysed to riding a bike in days
By Alex Spencer – [email protected]
Published: 17 June 2021 | Updated: 00:03, 19 June 2021
Just a few weeks ago, Cambridge businesswoman Adelina Chalmers couldn’t wash herself without help and needed someone to feed her. Friends would bring her food but she couldn’t even heat it up in the microwave – she had forgotten how it worked.
She was having disability aids fitted in her house – a mattress lift, a bath board, a wheelchair-accessible toilet. All because she was experiencing overwhelming, crushing fatigue, brain fog and breathlessness.
After making plans to end her life because she believed she would never recover, Adelina has now discovered a simple treatment that took 30 minutes to administer which has reversed all of her symptoms. And she had gone from being almost paralysed to riding a bike in 12 days.
Adelina, 38, says: “I was desperate. I was investigating going to Dignitas in Switzerland to get myself killed because I didn’t want to live like that. I was talking to my best friends and saying I might have to die. They were shocked and said it’s your decision, I can’t force you to live, but I love you and I will miss you. My friend who had been helping me at home said to me: ‘I will do this forever. I will come and cook and clean for you forever’.
“I mean, I have amazing friends but they shouldn’t have to do that. They came to feed me and changed my bedsheets and did my laundry. And all the time my GP said I was fine and there was nothing wrong with me.
“I want other people to know what I have now discovered and how I recovered because lots of people are suffering like this and there is no need for it.”
Adelina, a business consultant known as the Geek Whisperer, was struck down with Covid-19 in March last year. She fell seriously ill with breathing problems and was hospitalised. But she appeared to have made a full recovery after three months, taking up a new exercise regime in June.
“My GP told me I needed to do more exercise to increase my lung capacity after Covid so I exercised like crazy, 25 to 30 hours a week, because I’m not a half-assed or ‘good enough’ kind of girl. I went all in. Actually that turned out not to be healthy but nobody told me it wasn’t and I lost about 25 kilos over the six months. But then literally six months to the day I started exercising, I relapsed with long Covid symptoms.
“I started getting shortness of breath at the top of the stairs and I thought that’s odd because I can literally run up the stairs. I was worried that maybe I had covid again. And then it just got worse and worse: shortness of breath, nausea, dizziness, and by the end of February this year I just couldn’t walk any more. I completely collapsed. I was effectively paralysed. I couldn’t even blink without effort because my eyelids felt like titanium. I couldn’t think; I couldn’t work; I couldn’t speak. I needed people to take me to the toilet and wash me. Overnight it had got really bad and was much worse than Covid itself. I thought I was going to die.”
After speaking with a doctor friend in Europe, Adelina learnt she should have her iron and B12 levels checked following Covid as deficiency in these was being noticed in other long Covid sufferers. She had the tests done through her GP surgery but was told they had come back normal.
“My doctor said to me ‘your blood tests are fine’. He said ‘you have a little bit of low iron but that’s nothing, you shouldn’t be as bad as this’. He said: ‘There’s nothing wrong with you. I don’t know why you feel like this,’ and he gave me some iron tablets’.”
A second round of blood tests showed Adelina’s iron had increased slightly after taking supplements and she says she was told: “There is no explanation for the way that you feel.”
Unable to bear the thought of spending the rest of her life feeling so sick, the businesswoman decided to ask to see her test results.
“I wanted to look at the data,” says Adelina. “And when I saw the results I realised not only was my folate level only 0.01 in the normal range, my ferritin (iron) was just three points within the normal range. So everything was on the edge of normal and it wasn’t normal for me.”
Realising she was at the end of the road with her GP after being told there was nothing wrong, Adelina contacted the Cambridge Iron Clinic at the Nuffield Hospital and met with consultant Dr Andrew Klein to find out whether her iron levels were causing her symptoms.
There, Dr Klein confirmed that her levels of iron and B12 were dangerously low and gave her an iron infusion as well as ordering her regular B12 injections.
Adelina says: “I had an infusion of iron 12 days ago at the Nuffield. The doctor told me within six weeks you will feel absolutely fine.
“I said I can’t believe that because I can barely walk right now. But I was willing to pay anything because I thought I was dying. I was talking to my friends about dignity in dying.
“I had just been offered adaptations for my toilet on the NHS but didn’t take it up. It turns out none of it was necessary because I just needed an iron infusion that lasted half an hour.
“It has been 12 days now and I’m 85 per cent better. I can shower on my own, and I can start working again. It’s insane.
“I’ve just been out for a one-hour bike ride and a couple of weeks ago I could barely walk. It’s amazing to feel better but I am furious that this pernicious anemia caused by long Covid wasn’t picked up.
“Before I had the treatment I was getting dementia signs. I looked at the oven and I knew it cooked food but I didn’t know how to turn it on any more. I’d think, what do I do with these buttons?
“Even blinking was difficult. I couldn’t listen to anything. I tried to watch a movie because I was just sitting down like a paralysed person but within 10 minutes I got a migraine from sensory overload.
“I never want to go through it again. It was just torture. If you go on long Covid forums you see hundreds of people with the same symptoms.
“So many people are people suffering from long Covid, like brain fog and fatigue, but the system is set up in such a way that more and more people are told there is nothing wrong with them and they are given inappropriate treatment that delays their recovery and can make them severely disabled. If I hadn’t been given the right treatment I would have ended up disabled.”
Dr Klein told the Cambridge Independent that he had seen many patients with similar symptoms to Adelina’s and that long Covid could be playing a role in making them worse.
He explained: “Certainly the combination of pernicious anaemia and Covid is a nasty one and I have seen quite a lot of it.
“Patients like Adelina describe terrible fatigue. They can’t get out of bed, they can’t work, they can’t exercise, they can’t do anything.
“We think that long Covid may be an autoimmune condition where patients have the Covid virus and it triggers their immune system in an abnormal fashion.
“The body then attacks itself and then in so doing that perpetuates the symptoms of fatigue, exhaustion, shortness of breath, being unable to exercise and so on.
“Along with the autoimmune disease you get poor absorption from the stomach of essential nutrients such as iron, vitamin B12, vitamin D and selenium. Basically the symptoms of long Covid are the same as iron deficiency and B12 deficiency – fatigue, exhaustion, shortness of breath: all the symptoms that Adelina suffered.
“I think the two conditions make each other worse.”
Research just published by the University of Birmingham supports this theory. A study funded by the UK Coronavirus Immunology Consortium has found that many patients with Covid-19 produce immune responses against their body’s own tissues or organs.
The study, published on June 4 in the journal Clinical & Experimental Immunology, investigated the frequency and types of common autoantibodies produced in 84 individuals who either had severe Covid-19 at the time of testing or in the recovery period following severe Covid-19 and those with milder disease that did not need to attend hospital. These results were compared to a control group of 32 patients who were in intensive care for another reason other than Covid-19.
The study found higher numbers of autoantibodies in the Covid-19 patients than the control group and that these antibodies lasted up to six months.
Dr Klein, from the Nuffield Hospital, said: “Once patients who are very low in B12 and iron receive treatment they feel much much better. There is no doubt about it.”
He added that the problem with NHS blood tests for iron levels and B12 are that the range of results described as normal was a measurement of whole population levels, but that a patient could still suffer symptoms at the lower end of the normal range.
He said: “There is recent research suggesting that the population ‘normal’ is actually low and causes symptoms and that you need to have a higher level than the lowest in the range.
“So patients who have levels the laboratory thinks are normal actually improve with treatment.
“In other words you need to have higher levels than the laboratory tells you.
“Adelina showed that level was not normal for her and she needed a higher level for her body to function properly. B12 is important for the nerves and because the brain is part of the nervous system a lack of B12 will affect the brain’s function. And iron is needed for oxygen carriage around the body. She had very low levels of both so the combination of treatment for both allowed her brain to function better and her body to function better.”
Sign up for our weekly newsletter for a digest of news and analysis, science and business, culture and sport – direct to your inbox every Friday
Check out the efficacy of your vax batch…
- How Bad is my Batch – vaccine and drug safety – check adverse effects
Search engine for adverse effects of medicines, drugs and vaccines. Search 100 different vaccines and 1500 different drugs.
.
© 2025 Deacon Martin